Estilete, papel, dobras e corpos: colagens do binário de gênero em duas políticas de saúde do Brasil

Abstract

The research attempts to describe and analyze how these terms emerge in the National Policies. Through an intersectional lens, this paper discusses how the use of “woman” and “men” is intertwined with cisheteronormativity and sex-gender binary logic, aiming to broaden SUS’s comprehensiveness. The methodology was qualitative, descriptive, and based on documentary research, using Michel Foucault's Discourse Analysis in dialogue with Social Psychology, Queer Studies, and Transfeminism. The analysis showed that the sex-gender binomial operates historically, regulating and stabilizing cisgenerity, heterosexuality, whiteness, and coloniality in the political dimensions of comprehensive health care. Despite being an achievement of feminist demands, the PNAISM still maintains its central focus on maternal and child norms and on the white, cisgender, and heterosexual public. The PNAISH’s main goal is not to address changes in gender relations but rather the Sstate's financial problems. Thus, it is centered on hegemonic, white, cisgender, and heterosexual masculinity and reaffirms the role of the “man” as provider. The research concluded that the terms “woman” and “man” are supported by genitalists according to a cisnormative logic, remaining stable, ciscolonial, and aligned with whiteness, operating only to marginalize plural identities and sexualities. The practice of collage was used as a metaphor and led to the production of a fanzine as an informal product for circulating the research results.